Harvest of Blood? A Radical New Theory About Cattle and Human Mutilations
This
is the way I see it: Nearly every report of cattle mutilation, (as well
as a few human cases), harps on in meticulous detail about how various
tissue samples were neatly removed, (Cored) from the cadaver; but far
less is made about how it was drained of blood - usually with not a
drop remaining; Exsanguination - which is a major job when you think
about it, especially on a large beast like a cow, which contains about
35 pints of blood.
In
my opinion, researchers tend to dwell on these eye, ear, anal and other
tissue removals, much more so than the mystery of all this missing
blood: I have begun to wonder whether these bits and pieces that have
been surgically removed are merely of secondary interest to the killers
themselves; maybe after all, it is the blood itself which is the main
reason for these slayings.
So, could it really be that 'they' are Harvesting Blood from their victims, and that this is being utilized in some way by whatever, (or whoever), is responsible for these Horrific Crimes? or is there some other explanation?
As a friend of mine commented on this matter, 'blood has energy that can be utilized in ritual by summoned entities; Crowley used 4 birds when he summoned Choronzon in the Sahara, but the blood has to be fresh.... Icke mentions similar stuff in respect of 'sacrifices' to give reptilians energy, but stale blood? Doesn't fit the picture - neither does removal of body parts'.
